Monster Introductions

Act 1 of Diablo 3, particularly the first half leading up to the death of the Skeleton King is exceptionally well structured and “paced” with the introduction of monsters and concepts. New elements are introduced, tested, and compounded before you are then thrown into the depths to find and fight the Skeleton King.

The game begins simply. First, you see a corpse. A clear, bloody, warning.

Then you see a zombie eating a corpse.

Then you come to a barricaded town, littered with corpses. The living are there too, and the zombies attack. New zombies (crawling torsos) pop out in the second or third wave as a surprise escalation.

When you win, you go into town. The living are scared, and then omg some of the living transform into zombies!!!!

The living speculate there is a source. “Wretched mothers” and a “queen” that are supposedly the source of these zombies. You return to the barricade, part of it breaks apart as zombies, led by one of these wretched mothers attacks.

You go to seek the source of this problem. Now that you’ve been exposed to all the types of zombies, you are tested along the road by them. Basic zombies. Big zombies that can fall apart and become a torso only zombie, mothers who spawn in more basic zombies.

A new monster, Quillboars, can be found along the road, but they almost always found off the road near the extreme edge of the map. So if you stick to the road you will likely not see any until you get to the ruins of Old Tristram. You may also encounter elite versions of the Quillboar first, looting the cellar of an abandoned home. They are inserted as if they are a more “natural” type of monster that has been pushed to the fringes due to the current zombie apocalypse.

Then, you reach the Ruined Cathedral and are presented with a clear descent into the mythic underworld.

Zombies first, but they are known (feeding upon a corpse) and you are introduced to a new mechanic of being able to use the dungeon against the monsters (falling chandelier). At this point, because a descent into another world has happened, most of the additional monsters are just kinda there and will be encountered at random. There is not a set introduction for these fresh horrors (skeletons, flying imp type creatures, big exploding horrors, leaches from inside the big exploding monsters).

Skeletons with shields are introduced, chasing the NPC you have come to the Cathedral to find, but they are immediately killed by falling rocks.

The ghost of the Skeleton King then appears, introduces himself officially (you may have found a few books about him on the 1st level of the Cathedral) and proceeds to demonstrate how he can “warp in” skeletons to fight on his behalf.

Then we get a town break/info dump/go help the blacksmith who’s wife becomes a zombie. Kill the blacksmith’s wife and he sends you off to find the crown you’ll need to destroy the Skeleton King.

Upon entering the next section, you’re basically immediately rushed by demon dogs.

All other monsters have been met before, and the focus remains on zombies (dead rising). You come to a graveyard, pass through the mass graves where the zombies rise to get you, and then reach 3 crypts, and smaller graveyard. The dead coming up out of the ground change from zombies to skeletons here perhaps due to association with the Skeleton King? You know the crown can be found in one of the crypts, but which…?

Again, entering into a new underworld seems to automatically indicate that new stuff should be expected. In addition to the previous monsters, you get a couple types of ghost, and imps that run around like corrupted children. Once you find the correct crypt however, you get one of the best monster introductions in the game. In an empty crypt, there is a large sealed door, like those seen in the Cathedral, and as you get close the door begins to move and you can hear heavy banging, and then BAM! A giant undead abomination pops out to get you.

On the other side of this door, another new monster, typically introduced (but not guaranteed to be) by its laughter from the darkness. A skeleton, surrounded by an aura of magic that has an appearance similar to the Skeleton King, that warps in skeletons. Visual connectedness and similar behaviors build on each other with each new introduction.

With the crown recovered and then repaired, you then return to the Ruined Cathedral where all of these monsters appear. Their introductions are over, the “test” begins, can you defeat the Skeleton King?

Obviously this is all pretty “linear” and “video gamey” but hey, it was made for a linear video game! Still, I think the guts are solid, and they jive well with other things we’re seeing in the OSR scene, such as Skerples Tomb of the Serpent Kings with its focus on “lessons” taught to you by direct interaction with the dungeon, and Chris McDowell’s “Three Step Dungeons” post that dropped today.

Monster Sets

I play Diablo 3 almost every night before going to bed because it puts me to sleep. The exploding corpses, demonic screams, and trash legendaries are apparently super cozy for me, and after about 15-20 minutes it take all my remaining energy to get from the couch to bed. Ultimately though, running rifts or bounties is really a very simple, thoughtless process that lets my mind wander, and simultaneously, the legendary drops provide just the right amount of lottery ticket style dopamine hit to keep me mildly interested.

But how does this relate to table top RPGs? There are a few things Diablo 3 does very very well that I think should be stolen by the tabletop world. Broadly, these are monster sets and monster introductions.

Making “sets” out of monsters is nothing new to tabletop or video games. There are monsters that commonly go together (goblins, hobgoblins, and bugbears), and the types of creatures/monsters found in the “starter forest” are typically different (even if simply recolored) than those found in the “mountains of doom”. I bring this all up because recently I saw a few tables for wilderness encounters that took an “everything and the kitchen sink is a possible encounter” approach. I personally don’t like it when the tables are too random. Random is definitely good. Incongruous results are definitely good because they challenge everyone’s expectations and get the creative juices flowing. But if each roll yields vastly different things, as far as I’m concerned, it’s much more difficult for the fantasy world to “gel” in a person’s mind.

“Wait, we’ve been walking through a forest and first we came across tiny clay golems, then a sphinx, then slaadi? Is this place special? Is Limbo leaking? Is there a portal? Should we investigate thoroughly? No? This is just the forest we’re supposed to pass through to get to the dungeon you designed? Huh….”

What the Diablo 3 designers did really well in this regard is that they seem to have picked/created a variety of monsters that work well with each other to put different and constant pressures on the player.

Usually, you’ll get the following:

• The “front lines” monster. Basic melee pressure. Middle of the road in terms of stats.
• Ranged attackers. Go down fast, but hard to get to.
• The Threat. This is something that can hit very hard but it tends to be big and slow. You know it’s coming, and you know you’ll have to prepare or you’ll get dropped.
• The “Attention” Problem, or perhaps a better name would be “The Immediacy”. This can come in many forms and fashions, and it’s the thing you need to deal with right now or it will make everything much worse. However, by putting your attention on it, you must expose yourself to the melee and range pressure, and allow The Threat to get closer (potentially too close).

The Melee, Range and Threat are probably pretty obvious. Here are some examples of attention problems.

1. Monsters that put temporary shields of invulnerability on other monsters. Never itself. Usually applies the shield right as you’re about to kill your target.
2. Swarms of small monsters that do not deal much damage, but will overwhelm you if ignored.
3. A drum that must be hit two times to be destroyed. If a monster reaches it, it will begin playing a song that enrages/buffs the other monsters in the area.
4. A monster in the middle of a ritual. If it is completed things will get much worse.
5. A monster who resurrects other monsters.
6. A monster who spawns other monsters.
7. A monster who generates some sort of invulnerable and devastating “zone control” such as a poison cloud or fire patch.

These monsters are usually easily identifiable. The green nests that spawn in bat-like monsters with stingers are obvious and don’t change. Once you fail because you underestimated their ability to spawn in new monsters, that knowledge can be built upon and reused. It may seem kinda lame to use smaller sets of monsters due to repetition, but I think that’s a pretty foundational requirement for enabling player skill to shine. If each new monster encounter is with a fresh, random chimeric aberration, then the player skill being tested is meta “real world” type knowledge. If the monsters repeat with decent regularity, then the player skill being tested is based on in world, in character experiences.

I’d say, when making a dungeon or a zone, keep the melee, ranged and threat types pretty consistent and repetitive. This is a crypt with skeletons. Some have swords, some have bows or shoot fire bolts, and some drag a giant axe that can cut you in half if they get close enough. Repeat these basic things, but then keep players on their toes and ratchet up the pressure with a few different attention consuming monsters, and limit your random encounter tables for the area to these things.

That’s all for now!

OSR Blog Renaissance?

My personal blogging died for a couple of reasons. Mainly because my mainblog (swordfishislands.blogspot.com) was always supposed to be about well… the Swordfish Islands Hexcrawl and talking about unrelated things, even if they were RPG or gaming related always felt off. Then Google Plus came along and really easy to “micro-blog” and it pretty much completely won me over.

To be fair, I wasn’t anywhere near being an “OG” blogger in the OSR scene, so I lacked a lot of the deep roots others in the community have, but I did read their blog posts pretty much constantly.

Now that G+ for plebs is being taken out behind the shed and “sunset”, I am hopeful that blogging will return to the forefront. It’s relatively easy, and frequently free to setup, and bloggers have a great deal of control over their sites (too much so sometimes that all the choices and options can be daunting). IMO blogs serve as a good entry point into pretty much any sort of hobbyist community, such as the OSR or DIYRPG scene. Not only are blog posts (typically) more long form and thorough in nature, “valuable” conversations on “important” topics typically happen by way of multiple bloggers writing multiple posts on multiple blogs about the same topic. This provides a myriad of entry points for new people to stumble into quality conversations. Social media takes the opposite approach, “valuable” and “important” conversations (typically) happen when a number of people all find and join a singular thread. And usually if you miss the thread, you miss it all (hence the importance of “subbing” and “.”ing on Google Plus).

But of course, blogs have their own problems, the main ones as I see them being:

• How the fuck to you keep track of all the blathering?
• How do you ensure you’re not overwhelmed by the person who posts relatively low value posts but frequently, and conversely, ensure that you don’t miss who posts high value but seldomly?

The answer is pretty much: RSS Feeds. And there are lots of solutions, but I want to talk about Inoreader. But first, a few callouts. I have no connection to Inoreader in anyway. Many (maybe even all) of the things I discuss may be covered by another feed reader. This isn’t meant to be a comparison piece, simply a “look at the potential of this awesome tool I found!”

Here are some of the high points and capabilities of the tool that I consider to be relevant to the OSR scene.

 

1. You can Import and Export OPML files. These are basically a list of blogs (or well, RSS feeds) that you want to follow. If you manually add RSS feeds to Inoreader (or any feed reader really) they’re pretty much guaranteed to be saved in, or exportable into, this format. Point being: if you’re using a different reader, you can move over easily. You can pick up a big mega OSR related OPML files over on the amazing Ramanan S. blog Save vs Total Party Kill.
2. You can subscribe to OPML files. I haven’t messed with this one directly yet, but as I understand it, if you didn’t want to manually maintain your own list of RSS feeds, or if someone wanted to “curate” a list of feeds on a particular topic, you could use Inoreader to subscribe to that big list o’ feeds, and not have to do any work. Of course, if the list went down or went away, or the owner of the list made changes you didn’t like you’d be shit out of luck, but this is just another tradeoff in the eternal war between centralization and federation isn’t it?
3. You can sort your feeds into folders. Want to follow a bunch of pixel artists AND a bunch of OSR types AND Raspberry Pi enthusiasts? But you don’t want all the different topics to be muddled into a single mega feed? No problemo. Folders are your friend. Only potential problem with Inoreader is that you CANNOT create subfolders. So, for example, if you made a folder for pixel artists, and one for OSR types, but then you wanted to extract the OSR blogs you considered “must read”, you couldn’t make the “Must Read OSR Blogs” a subfolder of the OSR blogs folder.
4. You can sort feeds into bundles. Bundles are basically folders, but they can be found and followed by other Inoreader users. Could be a nice way for Inoreader users who are into RPGs to find the OSR scene if they don’t know about it already. Can also be a good way for new people that find the scene via social media to start following blogs. (e.g., “Yeah man, just sign up for Inoreader and once you’re in search for the OSR “bundle”).
5. You can sign up for an unlimited number of feeds with the free version of Inoreader. I only call this out because Inoreader says this specifically. Feedly (another RSS reader) says you are only allowed to subscribe to 100 feeds as a free user. Now, many free users of feedly have said that they subscribe to way more than 100 feeds, and I do not doubt them. It is possible though that there may be a day of reckoning in this regard if blog/rss popularity begins to rise again.
6. You can subscribe to YouTube channels (and more). It’s effortless. You can watch the videos from Inoreader itself, and you can see them as they are posted pretty much. There can be delays of course, but it’s not going to be that situation where when you subscribe to a channel on YouTube directly and are never notified that new videos are being posted…. And not just YouTube. You can subscribe to anything that has an RSS feed, and there are even some sites out there that can sort of add RSS feeds to things that don’t normally have them, such as an instagram account. You should understand that those typically vanish pretty rapidly, but still, it’s part of the possibilities that exist.
7. Automation via Search + Rules + Tags and more. This is the big daddy, but in order to use this to its fullest extent, you’ll need to pay for Inoreader. However, the max level is only $50 a year, but if you’re a small publisher, I think it will absolutely be worth it. Let’s dig into this.

Here’s a potential use case for Automation via search and rules. Let’s say you’re an independant publisher. You can set up a search that looks for the name of your book. This search can be run on the feeds you subscribe to. It can also be run on all publicly available feeds in the Inoreader ecosystem (but only if you’re paying $50 a year). It can search Twitter, G+ (for now), and Google News as well.

Then rules can be made (again, if you’re paying) to do things like:

• highlight the searched term in the articles
• tag the article (effectively automatically putting a copy into a “folder” associated with that tag)
• mark things as read or filter out the article based on the search term
• send an email notification or send the article to an email address of your choice
• Match if an article has attachments
• match if an article has images
• match URLs
• Rules can chain
• and more

So, theoretically, a small publisher could set something up so that all articles containing the title of their book are tagged and automatically put into a tagged folder for viewing. This could be refined to ignore certain URLs or feeds. It could be refined to only pull articles that contain the name and an image. Or, with some Regex, it could look for articles containing the book name and any words from a list of negative or positive words to potentially identify good/bad reviews.

Rules could also be set up to look for specific time periods. So if you saw a sales spike or a harassment campaign, you could quickly search all the blogs you follow for mentions to try and figure out what happened.

You could also potentially set things up to “automatically” pull potential “news clippings” by month so you could make reports for other members on your team

Or, you could do something like, set up a search that looks for “hexcrawl” or “hex crawl” and contains the word “map” and has an image in the post, and pull it into a folder for focused perusal.

And then of course… you can set all this up on your desktop from your browser, but check it constantly from the Inoreader App on your iPhone or Android device.

I am legitimately excited by the potential of all of this.